Monthly Archives: June 2023

4 posts

What Zen Archers Can Teach Us About Poetry

Paul Muldoon (ex-poetry editor of some magazine or other called The New Yorker) has thoughts about young poets (age 9 to 99). He says their undoing comes when they think they know what they’re doing. If this happens, he says, they’ll most likely “disimprove.”

How do they reverse this trend (or improve from the get-go)? Muldoon’s advice, which he admits elicits head-scratching, is that they read Eugen Herrigel’s cult classic Zen in the Art of Archery. You have to allow yourself to go to a place of “innocence and ignorance,” to forget yourself, to give yourself over to a certain mysterious “it.”

If that sounds like something the too-busy-with-wonder-to-become-vain child you once were would be very good at, you’re right. I imagine, then, that there are no answers in books on how to write poetry or in poetry critiques or in the very expensive letters “M,” “F” and “A.”

I imagine, instead, that poets need only go out in the world and take it all in slowly and with an alien eye. Return to the word-of-the-year when you were a 5-year-old: “Why?”

Notice things about nature and people you stopped noticing long ago because you mistakenly assigned them to that category called “boring, everyday stuff.”

Muldoon’s point is that ignorance, a label we abhor and give to people we have little respect for, can be a good thing for poets. Why? Because in some respects little kids are ignorant, but in a receptive and innocent way.

Can adults reconnect with this inner child-poet and let poetry “be done to them” rather than trying too hard to do poetry themselves? You need only reread your favorite poems from the past and present to know that the answer is yes.

Oh. And Zen in the Art of Archery, of course.

Nota bene: Apparently, this goes for all genres of writing. As I picked up a copy of Max Porter’s Shy, I noted an interesting blurb from author George Saunder. It reminded me of this very topic. See if you agree:

“Max Porter is one of my favorite writers in the world. Why? Because he’s always asking the most important questions and then finding ways–through innovative structures and that inimitable voice–of answering those questions soulfully, with his full attention, in ways that make the world seem stranger and more dear (or more dear because stranger). He gives his readers, in other words, bursts of vision.”

Asks questions? Makes the world strange and dear? Sounds very Zen by way of Muldoon to me!

 

 

Here is the YouTube clip of a larger interview Muldoon offered.

 

 

Poems of Love and Protest: Martin Espada

Prose poetry. Some people break out in hives at the term.

OK, how about narrative poetry written more in blocks than lines? (Some people who are cool with “prose poetry” say it ain’t prose poetry once you get more than two blocks, the blockheads.)

Good grief, man. Instead of looking at the hand, these folks need to look at the poetic license. Martin Espada is at home with political poetry too. Blatantly so. And it works.

Here are a pair from the book that should tempt you to dive in (apologies that line length limits at GR screw up the formatting):

 

Love is a Luminous Insect at the Window

 

for Lauren Marie Espada

July 13, 2019

 

The word love: there it is again, indestructible as an insect.

fly faster than the swatter, mosquito darting through the net.

How the word love chirps in every song, crickets keeping

city boy up all night. I wish I could fry and eat them.

How the word love buzzes in sonnet after sonnet. I am

the beekeeper who wakes from a nightmare of beehives.

To quote Durȧn, the Panamanian brawler who waved a glove

and walked away in the middle of a fight: No mȧs. No more.

 

Then I see you, watching the violinist, his eyes shut, the Russian

composer’s concerto in his head, white horsehair fraying on the bow,

and your face is bright with tears, and there it is again, the word love,

not a fly or a mosquito, not a cricket or a bee, but the Luna moth

we saw one night, luminous green wings knocking at the screen

on the window as if to say I have a week to live, let me in, and I do.

 

The Stoplight at the Corner Where Somebody Had to Die

 

They won’t put a stoplight on that corner till somebody dies, my father

would say. Somebody has to die. And my mother would always repeat:

Somebody has to die. One morning, I saw a boy from school facedown

in the street, there on the corner where somebody had to die. I saw

the blood streaming from his head, turning the black asphalt blacker.

He heard the bells from the ice cream truck and ran across the street,

somebody in the crowd said. The guy in the car never saw him.

And somebody in the crowd said: Yeah. The guy never saw him.

 

Later, I saw the boy in my gym class, standing in the corner of the gym.

Maybe he was a ghost, haunting the gym as I would sometimes haunt 

the gym, standing in the corner, or maybe he wasn’t dead at all. They 

never put the stoplight there, at the corner where somebody had to die,

where the guy in the car never saw him, where the boy heard the bells.

 

As the old saying goes: They don’t throw around National Book Awards (2021) for nothing.



How Do I Hate Thee? Let Me Count the Ways.

In a world with so much to hate, why not turn it into a cash crop? Why not have some fun with it?

Why not hate the trivial, for instance? Or the ridiculous? Or the usually-overlooked-when-we-think-of-hating, maybe?

I guess these questions went through the mind of Laure-Anne Bosselaar when she penned a poem called “The Pleasures of Hating.” For starters, the title grabs even the most distracted reader by the lapel and reels him in.

Hating? I majored in that at university, the reader confesses! Graduated summa cum laude, which is Latin for “to the point of showing off.”

So why not start with Mozart? Everyone hates Mozart, right? Eine Kleine Nacht-Hatred. And what about broccoli? Chain saws? Surely patchouli!

And so it goes, till you, the reader, are in on the joke and wishing you, too, could make a ridiculous list to hate. (I would, but I hate lists.)

But enough. Let’s take Bosselaar’s pleasure ride down the River Stynxs:

 

The Pleasures of Hating
Laure-Anne Bosselaar

I hate Mozart. Hate him with that healthy
pleasure one feels when exasperation has

crescendoed, when lungs, heart, throat,
and voice explode at once: I hate that!

there’s bliss in this, rapture. My shrink
tried to disabuse me, convinced I use Amadeus

as a prop: Think further; your father perhaps?
I won’t go back, think of the shrink

with a powdered wig, pinched lips, mole:
a transference, he’d say, a relapse: so be it.

I hate broccoli, chain saws, patchouli, bra-
clasps that draw dents in your back, roadblocks,

men in black kneesocks, sandals and shorts —
I love hating that. Loathe stickers on tomatoes,

jerky, deconstruction, nazis, doilies. I delight
in detesting. And love loving so much after that.

 

I suppose the greatest pleasure of all might come in the last line, the way Bosselaar sneaks in a rabbit punch for love, because no matter how boundless your hatred seems to be, it still leaves an entire sea of love by way of contrast.

Just stay away from the nightly news, OK?

The Hazards in Catch and Release

 

A Moth’s Digression

 

It was only a lunate zale moth, that hole

on my study wall.

 

I placed my hand over it, then slowly

slid it shut

 

until the cupped darkness fluttered

and my deaf palm

 

felt a whispering inside. Outside,

slowly opening its cell,

 

I saw the moth’s mantle of fur, the soft

chips of dust its wings brushed on

 

the Zen garden groove of fingertips.

A nudge and it flew, ascending

 

until a barn swallow hit it mid-flight,

leaving a brief hole in the air.

                                                       — Ken Craft

                

This poem appeared in my first collection, The Indifferent World (FutureCycle Press, 2016).