Monthly Archives: August 2018

5 posts

Writing Is a Solitary Pursuit, But…

marketing poetry opinion philosophy poetry submitting poetry writing writing poetry

Writing is a solitary pursuit, yes, as well it should be. And it seems best suited for the early morning hours.

But first things first. If you have a dog, you have a perfect excuse to walk it in pre-dawn darkness. Only this morning there was the full moon, making the headlamp unnecessary, and that white brushstroke of clouds around it, lining itself up for you and you alone. On mornings like this, only the brightest stars still have their say, and you say in kind, “Good morning,” with a humble nod of the head.

Back inside, dog fed, you make coffee like a Buddhist, listening as the water boils, enjoying the steam as it rises from the wet grounds, sniffing those warm echoes of distant Guatemala’s beans.

Waiting for the water to settle through the cone, I typically read a poem. This morning, opening Hayden Carruth’s Collected Shorter Poems 1946-1991, it was “Of Brook and Stone” on p. 245:

 

Bo, may you someday,
as I now you,
here by our brook in a yellow
August afternoon,

bless your son in his absence
from you, you then
standing as I stand, alone
on our big stone.

And may, though many changes
will have transmuted many
things, this rock still
hold you, and this old brook’s

water still flow then
as now, murmuring
beneath your feet of why
and how and when.

 

Kind of sad and beautiful, that, reminding me of my own absent son, of how we have things that are “ours” too, things as simple and lovely as a big stone. The first sip of coffee couldn’t help but taste better after that.

As a youngster, I was a writer of letters. Thus, the daily arrival of mail in the summer was an event. Approaching the mailbox. Hearing the rusty hinge upon opening. Hoping the hollow would be filled with envelopes, at least one of which was addressed by a friend responding in kind.

Nowadays, as a writer, there is some of that in checking morning e-mail. Writing is a solitary pursuit, yes, as well it should be. But one always anticipates the arrival of a stranger’s e-mail. A stranger / editor accepting one or more of your poems.

This is one thing writers live for, no? For their work to speak in some way to a stranger. A stranger eager to share it with even more strangers through publication. That way the poem can become a big stone, too, words flowing below it like a brook.

You stand on the stone. You think of others who now hold it in common with you. The “why and how and when.”

 

News Flash: Poetry Matters Again!

blathering comma mine opinion poetry poetry criticism publishing submitting poetry

The September 2018 issue of The Atlantic — a bit briny as usual — just beached itself in my mailbox and lo, there was a feature article on poetry in it! What’s more, it’s headline proclaimed (“Dewey Wins!”-like) “How Poetry Came to Matter Again.” Which means, in case you haven’t been paying attention, that poetry hasn’t really mattered at all. Up until now, I mean.

For full appreciation, you should read Jesse Lichtenstein’s article yourself. I can sum up its main points, however. The Pearly (Very, Very White) Gates have been stormed. Like Lazarus, poetry has been brought back to life, most probably by a dark-skinned, female, transgender Jesus.

Meaning: We owe a debt of gratitude to the very people our wonderful president Donny (and president of vice, Mikey) have little use for: immigrants, minorities, LGBTQ, and females.

This should come as no surprise to people peddling their poetry. In their submission write-ups, many markets make special points of soliciting work from these writers. This article clarifies why. New blood. New life. New voices. All good, especially if it makes poetry appealing to young readers and listeners, all but forgotten by poets of the past.

Also getting shout-outs in Lichtenstein’s article? Spoken word and performance poetry. Old-school types may be writing their poetry under bushels, sharing only with each other in the shadows of their critiquing covers before sending poems out along the traditional poetry highways to poetry magazines and poetry publishers, but the new schoolers are taking the road more digitally traveled.

They’re taking their poetry public to ITube, YouTube, and WeTube; to podcasts, Instagram, and open mics. They’re truly out there. Self-promoting, self-proclaiming, self-advocating. As Exhibit A, I need only say two words: “Rupi” and “Kaur” (or, as she is known in some poetry circles: “best” and “seller”).

Me, I am new to the poetry-writing world and have found it very tight indeed. Protective circles, the higher you go. Fellow back-scratchers. M’s, F’s, and A’s, sprinkled with teacher-poet’s pets who promote their proteges.

This does not make me a minority in the classic sense. It just makes me a (ahem) “seasoned” white guy who only merits the title “minority” as an “outsider.”

That’s OK, though. I took heart that this article promoted a renewed acceptance of the pronoun “I” and how new voices are unabashedly embracing it. I’ve written about the pronoun “I” and poetry before, if you’re a pronoun fan.

It’s also important to remember that, no matter what our backgrounds or identities, we are all similar in our humanity, though separate in our unique mortal coils, each built by unique histories.

In that sense, we are all immigrants to the world, all conscripted against our wills to our finite lives, all capable of speaking to readers no matter what their age, race, sex, or gender identity.

I like to think, at least.

So the lesson of the article is this: Poetry is not an ivory tower, it is a big tent. Poetry belongs to the people, and the people can be reached in new and unique ways.

What’s more, poetry does not and should not belong to select cliques. This includes poetry pecking orders. They should be toppled like statues of Stalin. Yet poets, young AND old, talented and published, still stick to promoting only their friends and writers they consider their equals.

If you want to write for yourself, that’s cool. For me, though, poetry without readers is like speakers without listeners. A supreme form of solipsism.

As JFK might have put it, then: Ask not what poetry can do for you; ask what you can do for poetry. Audiences are out there and waiting.

 

First-Place “Garbage”

poetry poetry books

As with journalism, poetry often rewards those with an angle. Got something new, different? Or are you the same old skylark, Grecian urn, and daffodils; the same old mended wall, spidery design, and woods-you-think-you-know?

In her chapbook, Reservoir (winner of the 2017 Yemassee Journal Chapbook Contest), Taneum Bambrick assembles 17 poems. Only they’re not your ordinary poems. Rather they got the jump on any competition by detailing the experiences of a young woman working a traditional “man’s” job.

And an unusual job it was — working out in the wilderness, picking up the neglected, the dead, and the unwanted. Stuff. Junk. Carcasses. Then trying to act nonplussed as it is heaved into the back of a pick-up or a thick bag or the landfills of memory.

What is life like with a garbage crew, then? For a taste, you can visit The Nashville Review for a look-see at the poem, “Litter.” Lots of alliteration. And imagery that reeks wonderfully off the page (screen, what have you). Forceful stuff.

In “Visitor’s Center,” notice Bambrick’s attention to detail and devotion to the exact words associated with a hatchery pond: “sturgeon,” “shoal,” “Coho,” “upper-tail lobes,” “bone plates,” “scutes,” “barbels.”

Something’s fishy all right. And the chapbook manuscript’s chances were lifted not only by the requisite talent in poetry but by the novelty in both topic and approach.

So if you aren’t familiar enough with something unique to write about, you can certainly approach it from a direction (upwind, I suggest) seldom taken. It might just land you a “Who, me?” win.

Congratulations to Taneum Bambrick, and continued well wishes to poets everywhere exploring the hidden angles of life.

Poetry — The Word, Not the Genre

blathering comma mine humor poetry

poetry

In recent months, the Poetry Foundation’s flagbearer magazine, Poetry, has been featuring the same cover, only with different typographical fonts and colors, using the six letters in the word “poetry.”

While I have not been ga-ga about what is being printed between the pages of this magazine, I do like the simplicity and beauty of laying out covers like this. I stare at them often, like a coffee-table book you never open but leave out for public amusement and occasional dust collection.

It’s a bit of a tic-tac-toe, really. Going with contiguous letters, you find a few familiar friends hiding in the word:

  • POE as in good old Edgar Allan
  • POT as in a saucepan or a hippie’s best friend
  • PET as in the little furry fellow at your feet
  • YEP as in an informal consent
  • YET as in “not…”
  • REP as in a shorthanded representative (it was probably caught in the POT)
  • PERT as in saucy and flip
  • OPT as in “out”
  • TOE as in the ten (we hope) lowest parts of your body politic
  • TOPE as in drinking to excess or (who knew?) a type of shark
  • TRY as in what poets do every day, supposedly
  • TREY as in being related to the number three (e.g. basketball’s 3-pointer)
  • RYE as in pumpernickel bread or a field of Holden’s own
  • POET as in the mirror you’re gazing at or the writers you should be but probably are not reading (coward)

poetry 2

Of course, once you move on to jumping letters, all poetry breaks loose:

  • ROPE as in a useful tool for sailors and hangmen
  • ROT as in a useful British expression
  • PREY as in, if it didn’t exist, PREDATORS would go out of business (or, like that “successful businessman, Donald Trump,” declare bankruptcy early and often)
  • ORE as in iron or Oregon, maybe
  • YORE as in “years of…”
  • PRO as in a professional abbreviator
  • TOY as in what hijacked Christmas
  • ROE as in the eggs of fish or lobster (ew)
  • PORT as in ships seeking a safe harbors, or a specialty wine
  • TROPE as in a used and abused figure of speech from days of YORE

And so on and so forth. You might get a subscription to try the game yourself, but I’m off this judging-a-magazine-by-its-cover kick so will make the Beatles and let it be.

Still, if you find more words and want to have useless (to posterity) fun with POETRY, feel free to comment away.

poetry3

 

Sour Notes Will Happen

opinion poetry poetry books poetry criticism

cherry

I thoroughly enjoyed Donald Hall’s hand-picked “best hits” (in 2015) The Selected Poems of Donald Hall. For me, only a couple of poems hit a sour note, but that’s a great batting average, for poetry.

One was “Black Olives,” which lamented high school days when young Donald was good at being a mascot, a class president, and a poet (his best line as a young poet: “dead people don’t like black olives”),but not a favorite of the beautiful cheerleaders. Seems the cheerleaders preferred (news flash!) halfbacks and quarterbacks — muscle and brawn over meter and ballads. But then, in the last stanza, the Empire (A Young Poet) Strikes Back (at an Elderly Age):

Decades later, after the dead
have stopped their blathering
about olives, obese halfbacks wheeze
upstairs to sleep beside cheerleaders
waiting for hip replacements,
while a lascivious, doddering poet,
his burning eyes deep-set
in wrinkles, cavorts with their daughters.

OK, OK. We all like to see the jocks get theirs in the end, but this is a tad yuck, no? Or maybe our times are too PC for their own comeuppance.

On a more serious note, I give you “The Master” in its entirety. It’s the type of poem established poets love to write (and can get away with) while unestablished poets would be laughed at if they submitted it to a journal.

It’s similar to novelists who talk about characters “taking over” their novels, wresting control from the author as in a prison uprising. Oh, brother. It all sounds accurate and deep, sure, until you read and reread and say, “Huh?” (Which is “dumbese” for “Where’s the emperor’s clothes?”). Here it is, by the name of (what else?) “The Master”:

The Master
by Donald Hall

Where the poet stops, the poem
begins. The poem asks only
that the poet get out of the way.

The poem empties itself
in order to fill itself up.

The poem is nearest the poet
when the poet laments
that it has vanished forever.

When the poet disappears
the poem becomes visible.

What may the poem choose,
best for the poet?
It will choose that the poet
not choose for himself.

I can appreciate how, as a person and poet, your own idiosyncrasies and sentimentalities and bad habits can get in the way, but to personify a poem like that? To imply that the poem has shoved its creator aside to touch the hand of God, Sistine Chapel-like? Whatever.

Still, I cannot emphasize enough that I count myself a big Donald Hall fan. And Jane Kenyon. I wish to hell the two could have written a few decades more on their little New Hampshire acre of paradise on pond at the foot of Mount Kearsarge.

As a final sour cherry, I picked a good one. It’s from the grandfather of all paying poetry markets, Poetry. The July / August 2018 issue. Here it is, in its entirety, scribed by the prolific writer Joyce Carol Oates:

Sinkholes

take you where
you don’t want to go.

Where you’d been
and had passed smilingly through,
and were alive. Then.

 

Whew. If you or I sent that baby in, it would not have made it past the first reader, a summer intern English major. But coming from the well-established literary firm of Joyce, Carol, & Oates? In! And taking up precious real estate.

Pass the cherries….